There's an entire hemisphere of my brain that can't believe I bought a Crust Cantilever Lightning Bolt. It's the side that drew me to graphic design with an emphasis on the written word. The hemisphere that makes me a font-weeny that pours over The Elements of Typographic Style, and have opinions about the differences between Helvetica and Arial. Christ, I obsess over typefaces even when writing utterly unimportant documents. Note for the Amazon guy to leave a package on the porch? Definitely Garamond. So how on earth did I end up with a bike whose model name is rendered in some kind of faux graffiti-esque face?
Crust Lightning Bolt Canti |
Crust brand name in pink "grunge" typeface |
Is it supposed to be some kind of skate punk thing? Homage to BMX? Don't get me wrong. I've been known to defend even the much despised Comic Sans typeface. Horrid in most places, but perfectly appropriate in a comic strip. Likewise the Lightning Bolt's type/iconography. It would sort of make sense on a skateboard or some of the brand's other models - the bikes that look like you'd naturally see them popping above the coping of an empty swimming pool. The Scapegoat maybe? Dude. Brah. Radical.
But on this bike? The Lightning Bolt's frame is a modeled on Jan Heine's classic French Réne Herse Randonneuse. Not exactly the heritage you'd expect from this typographic styling. All I can imagine is that the Crust guys came up with the name Lightning Bolt because they expected this lightweight to be fast, and the rest just followed from that. What a shame. But look, a bike designer gets to choose whatever graphics they want on their bike. I get it. If this is an expression of Crust's sensibility, why should they care what I think? Buy the bike or don't, pops.
So given all that, what was I thinking? How could I bring myself to plunk down so much cash for a bike that irritates me every time I look at it? Well, it's precisely because it seems to be such a GREAT copy of that 1952 Réne Herse that I could not resist. Matt is obviously seriously into bikes. You'd have to be to think it's a good idea to get into such a crazy industry. And as a dedicated non-competitive, Path Less Pedaled, "Supple Life" type disciple of Bicycle Quarterly, he built a super-light, thin-walled, low trail, 650b Rando bike. But he did it his way. And his way, if the packing tape on the box in which the Lightning Bolt was shipped is any indication, is a bit zany. Tropic punk? Psychedelic metal? Nerdcore?
Will Ferrell in Wedding Crashers w/ Crust logo on forehead |
Crust's packing tape expresses their sense of humor |
So, who am I to judge? You want the bike or not? Okay, yes. I want it. By the time it became available, I wanted it a lot. Maybe the result of perceived scarcity following the long wait associated with the pandemic supply chain issues of the past two years. Maybe the pre-sale note saying, "things are looking a bit dicey for Crust". Maybe just N+1 syndrome. Maybe the return to a horizontal top tube, combined with the sparkly black "Galaxy" paint job that got me. Probably all of the above. But in the end, it is the prospect of the bike itself that forced my hand.
Cycles Toussaint Vélo Routier, Version 2 |
You may recall that in Spring of 2018 I bought a Cycles Toussaint Vélo Routier. Like the Lightning Bolt, it is a Taiwanese, low-trail, 605b bike. It is, by its makers' own admission, an "entry level" bike, though I think that is so only in the sense that the components that came in the DIY build kit were entry level. The frame and fork have a couple of unique and glorious design elements that set the bike above and beyond every other production bike in it's category, the most striking of which is that it was spec'd for direct-mount, long reach, center-pull brakes. Unheard of. Even the tubing chosen for the Vélo Routier was as light as made sense for a production bike, using "oversize" (1 1/8") 4130 Cro-moly steel in .8/.5/.8. Honestly this a bike that could only have been built by a fanatic who didn't need the money.
But Taiwanese builders are used to building mass production bikes to safety standards that assure they won't get sued, so that "light" steel, roughly equivalent to Reynolds 531, is still stiffer than the .7.4.7 Jan recommends for bikes that "plane". You want that kind of steel in a production frame, you gotta sign a waiver. Legend is, Matt Whitehead is just crazy enough to sign such a waiver, and spec a fork that is much more slender than the one on the VR. Word is the Lightning Bolt is basically the same spec as Jan Heine's Mule. Whatever the case, the Lightning Bolt frame and fork weigh about 180 grams less, over half of which (93 grams) is in the fork.
The other, perhaps more significant difference between the Vélo Routier and the Lightning Bolt is in the geometry. Though Bike Insights shows a calculated trail for the VR at a ridiculously low 18.8mm, Cycles Toussaint themselves claim 30mm. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. But even the 30mm is very low by conventional standards. The Lightning Bolt comes in at 40.2mm (for the 42mm tires I plan to ride). The Lightning Bolt's wheelbase is a bit shorter, as is its chainstay. The bottom bracket is also a bit higher on the Crust. In theory, all of these very minor differences should yield a bike that is quite similar to my old one, but with possibly a little less "twitchy" feeling due to the higher trail. But other elements can have an effect too, like handlebar width, crank and stem length. I haven't gotten the build worked out yet - the frame was a bit of an impulse buy, so I haven't thought through the components yet. Any way you cut it, I expect the differences to be subtle. Time will tell.
Crust sticker included in the box in which the bike shipped! |
Lastly, there are a couple of elements floating around in my brain. First, there is still no brake attachment on the chainstay bridge. Not a deal-breaker by any means, and it probably saves weight - but they are elegant for any center-pull brake set-up, and the original prototype had them, so I can't help but be a bit disappointed. BUT, and I shouldn't be so excited about this, the Lightning Bolt has vertical rear dropouts. Now this is just about the most persnickety little thing, but the Vélo Routier has horizontal dropouts. Not a huge deal, but it caused me a lot of trouble early on, requiring me to purchase internal cam quick-release skewers, and it makes changing a rear tire difficult when the bike has fenders.Again, not the worst thing in the world, but I'm genuinely happy to see the more typical dropouts on the Crust.
Okay, enough for now. I'll post more as I start to think about the build. It's my intention to use a few parts from the ol' Parts Bin, mixed with some new "dream bike" parts that I'll have to save up for. Stay tuned.
...like you’re the star of the Brevet, leading everyone into a marshmallow and ice cream victory meal. |
Amazing! I have the Velo Routier 2.0 as well but this just tickles my fancies as well
ReplyDeleteHappy to tickle your fancies. I still love the Velo Routier - wild horses couldn't drag it away from me. But I'm ever in search of the elusive "planing", seeking that perfect ride. And despite my criticism of their aesthetic sensibility, I love the Crust mindset and am super happy to be able to support a small company making very special products. I felt that way about Cycles Toussaint too. Trek and Specialized will be fine. Support your crazy bike maker! Thanks for reading - Bartlebones.
DeleteI love my Routier, but I couldn't get the small sized frame, I had to opt for the medium; it still fits me but I always wonder if I could have copped the smaller size.
DeleteYeah, sizing bikes bought online can be tough. Especially for these bikes with horizontal top tubes. With a bike like the Routier, my opinion is bigger is better, as long as you can put your feet on the ground without torturing your taint. "Modern" bikes, with their compact geometry are more forgiving and allow more flexibility because, for the most part, they are too small and depend on loooonnnggg seat posts, short reach handlebars and variable stem length to compensate. Great for manufacturers who can make fewer frame sizes that fit more customers.
DeleteI have a 29 inch inseam and the Velo Routier Small (51cm) with 38mm tires fits me perfectly, though with very little room to spare. The old rule is that you should show no more than "a handful of seat post." I have about 4 inches from seat tube collar to the bottom of the saddle's rails.
After stand-over height, probably the most important consideration to determine the correct frame size is https://bikeinsights.com/cyclopedia/stack-and-reach. Do you feel like you're too stretched out? Do you feel like you're leaning too far forward? If your frame is too small you can adjust this by swapping stems/handlebars, moving the saddle back/forward, etc. But if your frame is too big, there's not much you can do about it.
Long and short, if the bike is comfortable while you ride it the way you prefer to ride it, it's a good fit. If it's uncomfortable, you should fix it or get a bike that does fit. Any other consideration is aesthetic - which is important, but not central to whether the bike is the right size for you.
Happy trails!
Thanks Bartle!
Delete